Fifth European Conference on Space Debris
30 March - 2 April 2009
ESA/ESOC
Darmstadt, Germany
Orbit Determination Issues and Results to Incorporate Optical Measurements in Conjunction Operations
David A Vallado and TS Kelso
Vladimir Agapov and Igor Molotov
Paper Presented at the 5th European Space Debris Conference, Darmstadt Germany, March 30 - April 2 2009
Introduction
- Conjunction processing becoming more important
- Must do all on all
- Two-line element (TLE) information of limited quality
- Search for additional observational data sources to replace TLE data
Background
- Conjunction Operations
- SOCRATES
- SOCRATES-GEO
- New effort in July 2008
- Focuses on Geosynchronous Owner Operator satellites
- Observations
- ISON
- Cooperative scientific activities since 2001
Overall Operation
Example - 8832
- Filter Position Uncertainty
- Initial TLE is not accurate enough
- Filter Residual Ratios
- Using Improved initial estimate
- Smoother Position Uncertainty
- Position Consistency test
- Comparison to TLE’s
- Smoother Ephemeris
- Ephemeris of TLE-TLE
Example – Intelsat 904
- Process entire interval (August – Nov 2008)
- Process interval (August 2008)
- ISON Data (with maneuvers)
- Compare Intelsat Reference Orbit to ISON Ephemeris with maneuvers
- Process interval (August 2008)
Example – Intelsat F3 (4376)
- Last TLE appeared in 1971
- ISON regular tracking
- Interval Jan 2008 to 2009
- Additional density of observations in Jan 2008 and Aug 2008
- Analysis from each of these two time frames
Other Implementation Issues
- Coordinate Frames
- J2000 isn’t always “J2000”
- Initial Orbit Determination
- Sensors
- Type
- Location
- How many sensors?
Implementation Issues
- Data
- Number
- Per pass
- Where located in a pass
- Total obs available
- Quality
- Format
- Best to create a script reader for each one
- We used ODTK and .geosc format
Observational Corrections Included?
- Ionosphere
- Refraction
- Other
GEOSC Observations
- Used in multiple programs - Extended for AGI programs
- Limited precision
- Data Types
- 10 = RtAsc-Decl
- 12 = Space Based Rtasc-Decl
- 71 = Az-el
Conclusions
- Optical Data is excellent data source (ISON)
- Can replace TLE data
- Generally km-level or less accuracy
- Increases confidence in conjunction answers
- Decreases unnecessary maneuvers
- Formats are important
- Data is important
- Type
- Quality
- Calibration
- Etc.
- Initial effort complete
- Mostly manual at this point, but could be automated rather easily
Sample Obs format
- Suggest a New format
- Simplifies many existing difficulties
- Interested in comments from the community
# this is intended to be a simple obs format
# the data is all space delimited so variable sizing (precision) is possible
# comment lines are preceded by the # symbol in the first col
# units are km and km/s and deg
Units = “km”
# obs are assumed to be earth fixed topocentric
# coordinate system is ITRF, ECI (Specify GCRF or J2000), or TEME
Coordinate System = “ITRF”
#
# data types control how much information follows on each line:
# 0 range only
# 1 azimuth and elevation
# 2 range, azimuth and elevation
# 3 topocentric right ascension and declination
# 4 ephemeris values (xyz, xyz dot)
# 5
# 6
#
#Typ Sat # Sen # Yr M D hr min sec value value value
2 7734 932 1995 1 29 02 38 37.000 2047.5023400 60.4991 16.1932
2 7734 932 1995 1 29 02 38 49.00010 1984.67700 62.143445 17.288761
0 7734 932 1995 1 29 02 48 49.0001 12952.7540340
1 7734 932 1995 1 30 12 8 6.005010 255.1423545 47.42558661
Navsol Observations
- AGI format (relevant parameters)
- Input ephemerides as observations
- Coordinate system, is Earth Centered, Earth Fixed (ECEF, ITRF)
- Data is space delimited
- No velocity vector
GEOSC Observations
- Used in multiple programs
- Extended for AGI programs
- Permits Range, Doppler, Angles
- Used in multiple programs - Extended for AGI programs
- Types
- 21 = Range
- 34 = Range-rate
Размещено 8 апреля 2009
Все представленные материалы размещены с согласия авторов докладов
|